Get Shorty
I found this NY Times piece at 8A, which offers an explanation on why the AF/WM numbers are so much greater than the AM/WF numbers–Asian guys are shorter, and therefore White women don’t want to date us. Similarly, according to the article, black women are taller, which may make White men less interested in dating them–or them less interested in dating White men. As you can see from the comments, the article and site took a bit of a beating from readers.
For those who have been around the AA blogosphere for a long time, this theory is nothing new. Ten years ago (god, I’m old), a controversial article by Steve Sailer came out, called “Is Love Colorblind?“, where he discusses his version of the same thing–Asian men are short and feminine, and black guys are tall and masculine, and therefore we get the shaft. The AA blogosphere went wild. In the end, according to the White Steve Sailer, he’s a White man, and he’s preferred by Asian women, and therefore, it sucks to be Asian and male. Woo hoo. (And dollars from Rice Chasahs since there’s a chnlove ad on the bottom of his webpage.) However, despite the controversy in the blogosphere, Sailer’s theory wasn’t new at the time either; it just happened to be controversial because it was written by a male member of the majority race whom our current Kingstonian culture benefits. If you look at some of the work by Stanley and Derald Sue, many were saying similar stuff in the 70’s. It’s funny to hear this stuff, and then to hear it again. I had a conversation with one of the 44s, and we were talking about how all this IR stuff from the AA perspective was stated by Frank Chin over 30 years ago. We say it, and then we say it again; we just don’t know that we’re repeating ourselves as a group. It’s nice to see it finally getting mainstream press. Even though it’s an uncomfortable topic, I for one appreciate that people are finally shedding light on this issue. The more light we shed, the closer we’ll come to resolution. And maybe we can stop repeating ourselves.
Some of the comments in the Times blog are interesting. First, there’s an Asian American guy in the UK who talks about experience in Europe vs in the U.S. See his comment here. Then there’s a comment about social status, which I’ve found to be true in my own experiences. Then there’s a comment about Asian men being less heavy than white men and therefore less masculine–I’m losing weight myself in preparation for my athletic training, thank goodness I’m already married! Then there’s a comment by an Asian American woman about how bad Asian men act. Believe it or not, I was glad she didn’t just make it a physical thing–it’s much easier to respond to cultural complaints than physical ones.
Seriously, the short term solution is this–for both Asian men and Asian women and minorities in general. Whenever there’s an imbalance or preference or disparity in any kind of market environment that disempowers you, accept the fact that you’ll have to be better to compete on equal terms. Still try to solve the problem at the societal level while accepting knowledge that you’re at a disadvantage as an individual. It’s the way the world works, and the sooner you accept it, the faster you’ll be able to move. It’s not fair, but at least it’s a way to get in the game and win.