Podcast: Interracial Relationships and the Gender Divide, Asian American Female Perspective
C-Bruhs (BicoastalBitchin), Eva (Blake and Micah podcast), and Sylvie (Antisocial Ladder) recorded an all-female podcast yesterday. It’s the third in an ongoing series about Asian American Interracial Relationships and the Gender Divide that we started last year on the first part and continued a few weeks ago with URB4N on the second part. This third one runs for just over an hour. Download it here (55 megabytes fat–not phat–since, once again, I ran into GarageBand problems), or listen to it here:
The podcast was recorded on InstantConference. Thank you to C-Bruhs for an awesome job hosting, and thank you to Eva and Sylvie for the excellent contributions and discussion.
I think this was a great step forward in the discussion. It was good to hear a compassionate inquiry on what is normally a hard subject to raise. As an aside, the only other Asian female podcast on the IR disparity that I’ve heard was led by an Asian American “feminist” and an Asian American “diversity consultant” who had obviously never dated or had had much interaction with Asian men, and the ensuing “discussion” quickly devolved into an anti-Asian male beat-down. This one was totally different (though I would’ve been cool regardless of what came out of it!). I really appreciated that C-Bruhs, Eva, and Sylvie were discussing long term implications and observations about both the present and future. Thank you all.
Some of my favorite parts of the discussion were the observation that when an Asian female says she prefers to date Asian men (33:40) it’s perceived as weird, the perspective that some activism wrongfully comes with conditions (43 minutes), and the question over “who has the power” (44:50). I appreciated that they analyzed individual behavior while taking the zeitgeist into account. I myself don’t pretend to be above and beyond the social pressures of the racial hierarchy, and I think we all need to consider what is going on around us. As humans, we’re social animals, and we need to take into account the role society plays in our lives.
There weren’t any areas where I flat out disagreed with what C-Bruhs, Eva, or Sylvie were saying. The only thing I might add to the discussion–something that I also mention when talking to men–is my belief that it’s hard to take the perspectives from one gender and apply them as a perfect fit to the situation with the other gender. An excellent book on the assymmetry between men and women in imbalanced gender situations is Bare Branches by Valerie Hudson and Andrea Den Boer. In Bare Branches, the authors talk about how women usually survive when faced with a shortage of men, such as in periods right after war. Men, on the other hand, often don’t do as well–historically, a shortage of women usually results in high crime rates, prostitution, and general unrest. I think that men react to an imbalance differently from women, and part of me is inclined to give at least some credence to the idea that it’s nature over nurture. (This idea was the one that got me into political trouble at my last blogging job, so if you all decide to beat up on me, please give me warning!) We can talk about this more either here or in future podcasts.
Anyway, give it a listen. I hope you all enjoy it as much as I did. As always, feel free to sound off like a WOWO.