<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Culture around a Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigwowo.com/2008/12/culture-around-a-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigwowo.com/2008/12/culture-around-a-book/</link>
	<description>Asian American Intellectualism and Activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaehwan</title>
		<link>http://www.bigwowo.com/2008/12/culture-around-a-book/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>jaehwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigwowo.com/?p=594#comment-532</guid>
		<description>papa2hapa:

I&#039;d agree that writing anything is political.  Thanks so much for the encouragement too!  It means a lot.  I see too from &lt;a href=&quot;http://noraebang.wordpress.com/2008/12/24/reading-is-fun-duh-mental/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;your blog&lt;/a&gt; that you&#039;re into lit too.  Awesome stuff.

It might be easiest to express what I was thinking through an example.

I invited an Asian American writer to Thymos, our activist group.  I told him that it would help his writing since we always talk about politics, the interplay of race in society, and questions of the writer&#039;s role in society.  He joined, but after a couple of months, he quit.  He said he wasn&#039;t interested in politics or the questions we raised.  He didn&#039;t have a problem with it, but he just wasn&#039;t interested in political or intellectual discussions.

There are writers who don&#039;t ask these kinds of questions.  They tend to focus more on words than on society, and therefore their writing seems to me to be a bit apolitical.  Some of them are decent writers, but the focus is different.  With this former Thymos dude, he would always focus on words.  He&#039;d send me examples of writing that he felt evoked amazing feelings through the usage of alliteration or word choice.

I agreed with him in just about all the examples he sent me, but the best moments in literature for me are scenes or occurrences, rather than words.  I&#039;m more interested in what they say about individuals or societies, rather than how they say it.  (although how they say it is also sometimes cool!)

TMM:

I&#039;m going to check out Henry Miller--once I can get out of this snow!

TMM and papa2hapa:

Also, I wouldn&#039;t mind being underground.  Getting paid is cool, but I&#039;d rather be a Frank Chin than a mainstreamer who&#039;s not telling it like it is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>papa2hapa:</p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree that writing anything is political.  Thanks so much for the encouragement too!  It means a lot.  I see too from <a href="http://noraebang.wordpress.com/2008/12/24/reading-is-fun-duh-mental/" rel="nofollow">your blog</a> that you&#8217;re into lit too.  Awesome stuff.</p>
<p>It might be easiest to express what I was thinking through an example.</p>
<p>I invited an Asian American writer to Thymos, our activist group.  I told him that it would help his writing since we always talk about politics, the interplay of race in society, and questions of the writer&#8217;s role in society.  He joined, but after a couple of months, he quit.  He said he wasn&#8217;t interested in politics or the questions we raised.  He didn&#8217;t have a problem with it, but he just wasn&#8217;t interested in political or intellectual discussions.</p>
<p>There are writers who don&#8217;t ask these kinds of questions.  They tend to focus more on words than on society, and therefore their writing seems to me to be a bit apolitical.  Some of them are decent writers, but the focus is different.  With this former Thymos dude, he would always focus on words.  He&#8217;d send me examples of writing that he felt evoked amazing feelings through the usage of alliteration or word choice.</p>
<p>I agreed with him in just about all the examples he sent me, but the best moments in literature for me are scenes or occurrences, rather than words.  I&#8217;m more interested in what they say about individuals or societies, rather than how they say it.  (although how they say it is also sometimes cool!)</p>
<p>TMM:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to check out Henry Miller&#8211;once I can get out of this snow!</p>
<p>TMM and papa2hapa:</p>
<p>Also, I wouldn&#8217;t mind being underground.  Getting paid is cool, but I&#8217;d rather be a Frank Chin than a mainstreamer who&#8217;s not telling it like it is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minoritymilitant</title>
		<link>http://www.bigwowo.com/2008/12/culture-around-a-book/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>minoritymilitant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 01:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigwowo.com/?p=594#comment-531</guid>
		<description>I read this story a few days ago as well. As for your question about underground literary folks, I&#039;d probably tell you Henry Miller. His books were censored for a long time here in these corrupted states before they became readily available. Tropic of Cancer is one of his best. There&#039;s also Tropic of Capricorn. That&#039;s if you like raw, in your face, used-to-be controversial obscenity that couldn&#039;t be accepted in the mainstream until maybe the 60&#039;s.

As for AA&#039;s, I really couldn&#039;t think of an undeground author with a loyal folowing. Maybe it&#039;s the way to go?? I dunno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this story a few days ago as well. As for your question about underground literary folks, I&#8217;d probably tell you Henry Miller. His books were censored for a long time here in these corrupted states before they became readily available. Tropic of Cancer is one of his best. There&#8217;s also Tropic of Capricorn. That&#8217;s if you like raw, in your face, used-to-be controversial obscenity that couldn&#8217;t be accepted in the mainstream until maybe the 60&#8242;s.</p>
<p>As for AA&#8217;s, I really couldn&#8217;t think of an undeground author with a loyal folowing. Maybe it&#8217;s the way to go?? I dunno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papa2hapa</title>
		<link>http://www.bigwowo.com/2008/12/culture-around-a-book/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>papa2hapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigwowo.com/?p=594#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Ha Jin ain&#039;t no slouch to admire!  However, man Asian American writers are activists by the very nature of expressing the diaspora of AA voices.  Without them, we&#039;d still be a silent sub-culture of America (not saying we&#039;re out of the woods yet).

Also, isn&#039;t the act of writing anything political?  After all, the greatest political ability we all have is voicing our opinion.  Keep writing, you&#039;re living it, even if you&#039;re not getting paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Jin ain&#8217;t no slouch to admire!  However, man Asian American writers are activists by the very nature of expressing the diaspora of AA voices.  Without them, we&#8217;d still be a silent sub-culture of America (not saying we&#8217;re out of the woods yet).</p>
<p>Also, isn&#8217;t the act of writing anything political?  After all, the greatest political ability we all have is voicing our opinion.  Keep writing, you&#8217;re living it, even if you&#8217;re not getting paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
